So, I should just shut up and go with SharpDevelop then? See, this is where I have to admit that I have a slight problem. I tried opening a large solution and it loads pretty darn fast. SharpDevelop seems to be more than happy with just a mere 64 Mb of storage. ![]() ![]() But is this kind of footprint justified for an IDE that proclaims productivity? Or is it just me?Īfter recovering from my amazement I tried installing SharpDevelop, an open-source IDE for building. Yes, I know that RAM memory grow on trees these days and that CPU power is growing increasingly. Yes, I know that we’re living in 2012 and that disk space is very cheap. Notice that the Express edition of Visual Studio seems to require no less than 4.15 GB of hard disk space! So I decided to try out the Professional edition of Visual Studio just to find out that it needs 7.56 GB to install!Īsk yourself, how on earth can an IDE that requires 7.56 GB to install be fast enough to even be usable at all? What kind of monster machine is required to not even choke to death when I accidentally open a second instance of Visual Studio? We’ve all seen those dreadful white screens of death, right? Something that really took me by the throat is this: This post included a screenshot from the installation program. I noticed this blog post from Scott Hanselman the other day about Visual Studio Express 2012 for Windows Desktop. Net 4.0, Tools and Utilities, Visual Studio: ![]() ![]() By: Jan Van Ryswyck Category:Uncategorized Tag.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |